The two strongest AI video families head to head: Kuaishou’s motion-control specialist against Google’s audio-native cinematic flagship.
Veo 3.1 wins when the clip has to arrive finished: it generates dialogue, ambience and effects together with the picture, and its cinematic look is the current benchmark. Kling wins on control and price — first/last-frame pinning, motion transfer from reference video, clips up to 15 seconds, and a flagship tier at a quarter of Veo’s base cost.
In practice many teams storyboard and iterate on Kling, then render sound-critical hero shots on Veo. On Nexvy both share one balance, so that split workflow needs no extra accounts.
Prices are in Nexvy credits — one balance shared by every model on the platform.
| Kling | Veo 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | Kuaishou | Google DeepMind |
| Versions on Nexvy | Kling 3.0, Kling 3.0 Turbo, Kling 3.0 Motion Control, Kling 2.6 | Veo 3.1, Veo 3.1 Fast, Veo 3.1 Lite |
| Price from (credits) | 540 ($1.08) | 320 ($0.64) |
| Resolution | up to 1080p | up to 1080p |
| Duration | 5–15s | 4–8s |
| Native audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Best for | Character motion, controlled shots, budget 1080p | Publish-ready clips with sound, cinematic ads |
Both models run on Nexvy with one credit balance — run the same prompt on each and compare the results yourself.
One account, one credit balance — run the same prompt on both models and let the results decide.
Kostenlos starten