vs

Seedance vs Veo 3.1

ByteDance’s long-take workhorse against Google’s cinematic flagship with native sound.

Quick verdict

Veo 3.1 produces the more cinematic single shot — richer lighting, stronger physics, and a complete soundtrack generated with the picture. Seedance 2.0 answers with stamina and economics: coherent clips up to 15 seconds (vs Veo’s 8), reference-image support, and flagship pricing at less than half of full Veo.

If the deliverable is a polished 8-second spot with sound, Veo is the shorter path. If it is a longer take, a consistent character, or a pipeline of many clips, Seedance gives you more usable seconds per credit.

Side by side

Prices are in Nexvy credits — one balance shared by every model on the platform.

SeedanceVeo 3.1
Made byByteDanceGoogle DeepMind
Versions on NexvySeedance 2.0 Pro, Seedance 2.0 Fast, Seedance 2.0 Mini, Seedance 1.5 ProVeo 3.1, Veo 3.1 Fast, Veo 3.1 Lite
Price from (credits)244 ($0.49)320 ($0.64)
Resolutionup to 1080pup to 1080p
Duration4–15s4–8s
Native audio
Best forLong takes, character consistency, volume pipelinesCinematic spots with generated sound

Both models run on Nexvy with one credit balance — run the same prompt on each and compare the results yourself.

Choose Seedance if…

  • You need more than 8 seconds in a single coherent shot.
  • Characters must match reference images across a series of clips.
  • Budget per clip matters — Seedance 2.0 Pro costs less than half of full Veo.
More about Seedance →

Choose Veo 3.1 if…

  • The clip ships as-is and needs dialogue, ambience and effects baked in.
  • Maximum cinematic fidelity per frame is the brief.
  • You mostly make 4–8 second hero shots, where Veo’s strengths concentrate.
More about Veo 3.1 →

Perguntas frequentes

Try Seedance and Veo 3.1 side by side

One account, one credit balance — run the same prompt on both models and let the results decide.

Começar grátis